permits.llc
Orlando Permit Data

Orlando's Biggest Permit Clusters Are Its Closed Market

By the permits.llc team · Last reviewed September 4, 2026 · Optimal window: Weeks 3–10

Three master-planned communities account for 6,888 Orlando permits since January 2025, 13.5% of every record in our City of Orlando file. Those permits were filed by 279 distinct firms. The other 86.4% of Orlando permits were filed by 5,490. Read that ratio twice, because it says the opposite of what a permit cluster usually says: the biggest concentrations of work in Orlando are the hardest places in the city to win any.

TL;DR

  • Three communities carry 13.5% of Orlando permits, filed by only 279 firms.
  • Outside them, 5,490 firms split the work at 8.0 permits each, not 24.7.
  • The payoff is timing: electrical lands 21 days after the building permit.
  • Mechanical lands at 71 days. One builder filing forecasts the whole lot.

Which Orlando communities are actually driving volume?

EverBe, by a distance. It carries 3,881 permits since January 2025, more than the next two clusters combined.

EverBe is a Pulte-developed master plan in East Orlando, off Lee Vista Boulevard near State Road 417, where Lennar also builds and markets its own collections. Our file shows both: Pulte Home Company filed 753 EverBe building permits, Lennar Homes 285.

Behind it sit two clusters of almost identical size. Laureate Park, the Tavistock neighborhood inside Lake Nona next to Medical City, carries 1,173. Meridian Park carries 1,164.

ClusterPermitsBuildingElectricalPlumbingMechanicalDistinct firms
EverBe3,8811,87774682043842
Laureate Park (Lake Nona)1,17358427418912539
Meridian Park (Starwood)1,16455124624512232
Lake Nona, other filings6703262075757197
All Orlando outside these44,0465,490

One counting trap before anyone repeats these numbers. Meridian Park is a village inside the Starwood development, and the descriptions say so: STARWOOD (MERIDIAN PARK) PH N-13S 119/89-103 LOT 1319. Search both names separately and you get 1,062 and 1,164 and double-count almost all of it. It is one cluster, built by Mattamy Orlando, which filed 304 of its building permits.

Why does 42 firms on 3,881 permits matter so much?

Because it is the whole argument. EverBe averages 92 permits per firm. Orlando outside these communities averages 8.0.

Production builders do not tender each lot. They arrive with trade partners already selected and run them through a subdivision for years. The permit file records the result with unusual clarity: 42 companies handled nearly four thousand filings in one community, and the same names recur across communities.

Look at the last row of that table again. Lake Nona filings that are not Laureate Park run 670 permits across 197 firms, which is roughly the citywide ratio. Same part of Orlando, same year, completely different market structure. The concentration is not geographic. It follows the master plan.

So the honest read for a trade contractor is uncomfortable and worth stating plainly: if you are not already on one of these rosters, these 6,888 permits are close to unwinnable this cycle. Cold outreach into a subdivision where the electrical seat has been held by one firm for eighteen months is not a pipeline, it is a courtesy call. The HVAC contractor playbook covers how to weigh that against the open market.

Who holds the seats right now?

Names, because a competitive census is more useful than a lead list you cannot convert.

In EverBe, electrical runs through Keystone Energy and Power (275 permits) and Phoenix Systems (238). Plumbing runs through Spegal Plumbing (249). Mechanical through Mechanical One (200). Roofing through Skymark Roofing (213) and C Sterling Quality Roofing (159). Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinklers, the second-largest filer in the entire Orlando file, shows up here too with 135.

Meridian Park has a partly different bench. Mills Air holds mechanical with 121, Proformance Roofing has 103, and Phoenix Systems and Keystone appear again on electrical at 111 and 94. The overlap is the point: a handful of firms have positioned themselves across multiple master plans.

Merge name variants before you rank any of this. Creative Walls and Landscaping appears both with and without the LLC suffix, and Mechanical One files under both mechanical and plumbing. Raw counts split those firms and understate them.

What the file does not show is why. There is no contract, no term, no exclusivity flag in permit data. Concentration is observable. The arrangement behind it is not, and we are not going to invent one.

Where is the actual opportunity in this data?

In the clock, not the community. The build sequence inside these subdivisions is measurable, repeatable and dated.

Take every lot in the three communities, find the first building permit at that address, then measure how long until the first permit of each trade appears on the same address.

Trade permitLots measuredMedian days after the building permit
Plumbing73620
Electrical73721
Mechanical67471

Rough electrical and plumbing land together at about three weeks. Mechanical is a different phase entirely, a median of ten weeks out.

That turns a builder's filing into a forecast. When Pulte files on a new EverBe lot today, the electrical and plumbing permits for that lot are due in roughly three weeks and the HVAC permit in roughly ten. You cannot use that to win the sub work on that lot, which is already spoken for. You can use it to time everything that orbits it: material supply, equipment delivery, staffing, dumpster and haul-off scheduling, warranty and service outreach to the eventual owner, and recruiting from crews you can see are about to be busy or about to be free.

It also tells a supplier when a community is entering its mechanical phase months before the equipment orders show up, which is a genuinely better signal than a sales rep's guess.

How do you find any of this without map data?

By reading the description field, and knowing what it actually holds.

Orlando permit descriptions are project names, not scopes of work. They read like STARWOOD (MERIDIAN PARK) PH N-13S 119/89-103 LOT 1319: development, village, plat book and page, lot number. That is a subdivision map rendered as text.

This matters more in Orlando than it would elsewhere, because the file has no coordinates and no ZIP field. There is no radius search to fall back on. The name text is the only geography this data has, which makes community matching not a clever trick but the only available method.

The same quirk is a trap for anyone counting scopes. Keyword-searching this field for "kitchen" or "reroof" undercounts badly, because most descriptions never mention the work at all. Filter by permit type and subtype for scope, and use the description for place. Our note on what permit data is and is not covers that distinction in general terms.

What will this data not tell you?

How many homes are there, for a start. A permit is not a house.

EverBe's 3,881 permits sit on 608 distinct addresses, an average of 6.38 permits per address, with 17 on the busiest. A single new home generates a building permit, then electrical, plumbing, mechanical and roofing filings, sometimes in duplicate across phases. Deduplicate to address when you want a home count, and expect the community to shrink by roughly six times when you do.

It will not tell you a contractor's license status either, because Orlando's license field is empty in our file. It carries owner names on 98.5% of records but no owner phone or email, and contractor phone on 56.0%, which is the best direct-dial coverage in the product but still only half the file.

And the boundary is the City of Orlando. Orange County's unincorporated area runs its own permitting outside this data, and the other 66 Florida counties are not in it at all. When Orlando's roofing market or the sub-$7,500 exemption come up, the same city line applies.

How permits.llc fits in

A permit is a signal about the property owner, not the contractor. In a master-planned community that signal arrives early and in order, because the developer files on a schedule rather than when a homeowner finally decides.

That is what makes these clusters worth watching even though the work inside them is closed. They are the most predictable 13.5% of Orlando construction, and predictability is worth more to an operator than raw volume. You can see which builder is active in which phase, which firms hold which trade, and roughly when each lot moves from framing to finish. Ranking what comes out of that is covered in scoring permit leads.

Two ways in. Download Orlando permit records to run the community match and the lag calculation yourself, or start from our Florida county coverage to see what the file holds first. New filings can arrive daily through permit alerts.

Most operators look at a permit cluster and see demand. In Orlando's master plans, the cluster is a schedule. Read it that way and it is worth considerably more.

Frequently asked questions

Get started

Download the free 2025 Orlando, FL permit dataset to see the real records, or set up daily alerts for the permits that trigger work in your trade.

Related playbooks